We've had quite a few emails and comments that two of the final three shortlisted entries are not actual buildings so thought we should give a general responce.
While the main set out of the competition was to design two types of housing - the brief did allow for people to submit their own unique solutions to the problem if they so wished and the judges were given the discretion to choose one of these if they preferred.
Obviously that wasn't the original intent of the project and these types of entry were intended to allow the debate to become more wide ranging but we were very happy to see other kinds of soloution.
Indeed there was a lot of discussion amongst the judges about this and they all agreed initially that they wanted an actual building to be the winner - the results however are what they finally agreed upon.
It is interesting to note that the public vote (to the right) completely disagrees with the "experts" decision and I am intrigued to see who the eventual winner is in public's eyes so we will count the vote at midnight on Monday and see who is the people's champion.
Labels: News